<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re gonna be in pictures!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/</link>
	<description>stuff from the life of craig &#38; julie kendall</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Very nice. Smart to get the same camera. In fact, I would always reccommend having the same camera on shoots so you can match and color correct the same.(even if you have to rent it....its worth it in post production).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. Smart to get the same camera. In fact, I would always reccommend having the same camera on shoots so you can match and color correct the same.(even if you have to rent it&#8230;.its worth it in post production).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigkendall</title>
		<link>http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>craigkendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Thanks man! We're getting there. Yes... We did get a second. Same one in hopes of making matching footage easier and it seems to have worked. Also have boom mic and wireless lapel with XLR adapter on each camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man! We&#8217;re getting there. Yes&#8230; We did get a second. Same one in hopes of making matching footage easier and it seems to have worked. Also have boom mic and wireless lapel with XLR adapter on each camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigkendall.com/2008/04/24/were-gonna-be-in-pictures/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Looking good. I like the B-roll. Very nice touch. Most people can't figure that portion out for whatever reason.

Did you get a second camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking good. I like the B-roll. Very nice touch. Most people can&#8217;t figure that portion out for whatever reason.</p>
<p>Did you get a second camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
